Legal Opinion
Care Choices Hmo, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Elizabeth Engstrom, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 30, 2003No. 01-2682, 01-2717PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
I
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Over the last two decades, Congress has struggled to reduce the cost of the Medicare program. One effort in this struggle is 42 U.S.C. § 1395mm, which permits the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), 1 the administrator of Medicare, to contract with private health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”) to provide replacement coverage for Medicare-eligible individuals.
Plaintiff Care Choices HMO is licensed by CMS to provide replacement Medicare coverage. Defendant Elizabeth Engstrom is a Medicare-eligible insured covered by Care Choices HMO. In 1998,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Guillermina Parra v. Pacificare of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Humana Medical Plan, Inc. v. Western Heritage Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Salt Lick Bancorp. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Potts v. Rawlings Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.