Legal Opinion

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 3, 2021No. 1:16-cv-01066Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-01066-NONE-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT 13 v. BETZ’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED AS TO 14 BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., BIVENS CLAIMS, AND THAT THE COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE 15 Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE LAW CLAIMS 16 (ECF No. 81.) 17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 18 19 20 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 23 forma…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API