Department of Revenue v. Faris
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
In this appeal from a decision of the Oregon Tax Court, taxpayers challenge a notice of deficiency issued by the Department of Revenue (department) as failing to comply with the statutory certification requirement of ORS 305.265(2). Taxpayers assert that the notice was not properly certified because it did not include a hand signature attesting that it was issued in good faith.
ORS 305.265(2) provides that the notice of deficiency shall:
“(a) State the reason for each adjustment;
“(b) Give a reference to the statute, regulation or department ruling upon which the adjustment is based; and
“(c) Be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Department of Revenue v. FarisOregon Tax Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Kohring v. BallardOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ReinkeOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Department of Human Services v. J. B. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.