Legal Opinion

Preble v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2000No. OTC 4130; SC S45863PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

This case, which is before the court on direct appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court, presents the question whether a notice of tax deficiency may be valid even though it was not certified, as required by statute. The Department of Revenue (department) concluded that the notice of deficiency at issue here was valid. The Tax Court agreed. Preble v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 276, 281 (1998). We conclude that a notice of deficiency must be certified to be valid. Accordingly, we reverse.

Because this case originally was filed with the Tax Court in May 1997, we review the decision of the Tax…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mulier v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bacote v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Department of Revenue v. FarisOregon Supreme Court · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API