Legal Opinion

Rolfs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1903No. 12,940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Leavenworth district court; J. H. Gillpatriok, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J. :

F. A. Rolfs commenced an action in the district court of Leavenworth county against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company to recover damages consequent upon his expulsion from ■one of the defendant’s passenger-trains on June 12, 1896. Concerning his right to be transported, he alleged as follows:

“That on the 12th day of May, 1896, said plaintiff ■purchased from the defendant, through its agent at *273Norman, Indian Territory, a book of mileage containing tickets for one thousand miles’ transportation over the lines of the said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Frederick v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Bradshaw v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Hufford v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Ry. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Murdock v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chase v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Jevons v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Freeman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Morrill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API