Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1910No. 420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George RL Clark, Judge. Action by R. L. Johnson against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant, brings error. —Citing: Elliott on Railroads (2d. Ed.) sec. 1598; 6 Cvc. 575; McGhee v. Dñsdale (Ala.) 20 So. 391; Railwcay Go. v. Dean, 43 Arle. 529; Railway Co. v. Watson (Ga.) 36 S. E. 209; Galaway v. ■ Mellelt (Ind.) 44 S. E. 198; Hanlon v. Railroad Co. (Iowa) 80 N. W. 223; Freeman v. Ry.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George RL Clark, Judge. Action by R. L. Johnson against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant, brings error. —Citing: Elliott on Railroads (2d. Ed.) sec. 1598; 6 Cvc. 575; McGhee v. Dñsdale (Ala.) 20 So. 391; Railwcay Go. v. Dean, 43 Arle. 529; Railway Co. v. Watson (Ga.) 36 S. E. 209; Galaway v. ■ Mellelt (Ind.) 44 S. E. 198; Hanlon v. Railroad Co. (Iowa) 80 N. W. 223; Freeman v. Ry. Go., 71 Kan. 327; Railway Go. v. Dwells (Kan.) 25 Pac. 500; Coburn v. Railroad Go. (La.) 29 So. 882; Railroad Go. v.…

1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, C. J.

This action presents error from the district •court of Oklahoma county. R. L. Johnson, as plaintiff, sued plaintiff in error, as defendant, in the probate court of Oklahoma •county, filing his petition therein prior to statehood. After trial in that .court the case was appealed by the defendant, against whom .judgment was rendered, to the district court of Oklahoma county, and a trial de novo had therein. Plaintiff was again successful ■and recovered a judgment, to reverse - which defendant has brought the case to this court. The action is one for damages on ■account of an alleged wrongful…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lillis v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Dangerfield v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Callaway v. MellettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Walker v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Hanlon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VosburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Industrial Loan & Inv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API