Pickert v. Rugg
North Dakota Supreme Court
PPEAL from district court, Griggs county; Hon. Roderick Rose, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, C. J.
The plaintiff has been so far successful in her effort to recover the value of wheat unlawfully taken from her possession. The wheat in question was seized by the defendant Walden, as sheriff, under an attachment against Rozell Pickert, the father and general agent of the plaintiff. Defendant McMahon appears to have directed the seizure, acting as attorney for the plaintiff in the action in which the attachment was issued. Defendants do not pretend that they could or do justify under the attachment against plaintiff’s father. They do not question plaintiff’s ownership of the wheat, but they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Gruman v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Laff v. LaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State ex rel. Broadwater Farms Co. v. Broadwater Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- First National Bank v. Red River Valley National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Miller v. Tidal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.