Legal Opinion
RCM Technologies, Inc. v. Brignik Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 19, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-2951(SSB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought claims of breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, and negligent misrepresentation against Defendants in the Superior Court of New Jersey. After removing the case on the basis of diversity of citizenship, Defendants ask this Court to compel arbitration and stay the legal proceeding. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion will be granted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This dispute arose out of the 1998 sale of Defendant Brignik Technology, Inc. (“BTI”), a computer consulting firm, to Plaintiff RCM…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cardionet, Inc. v. Cigna Health Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Bannett v. HankinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Renfrew Centers, Inc. v. UNI/CARE Systems Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bolinger v. Virgin Islands Telephone Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
- COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, NEW JERSEY v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.