Legal Opinion
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, NEW JERSEY v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 15, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01391Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-1391 (MAS) (TJB) MEMORANDUM OPINION UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, Defendant. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant Underwriters at Lloyds, London’s (“Lloyds”) Motion to Dismiss, Compel Arbitration, and Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 3) (“Motion”) arising from Plaintiff County of Middlesex, New Jersey’s (“Middlesex”) Complaint (ECF No. 1-2). Middlesex opposed (ECF No. 9), and Lloyds replied (ECF No. 10). After careful…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.