Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2009No. 06-CF-418, 06-CF-384PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
This case arises from a July 11, 2004 shooting that was carried out in retaliation for the November 2003 shooting of former Georgetown University basketball player, Victor Paige. On appeal, appellants Quincey D. Mitchell and Jerome P. Stroud, who were convicted of numerous offenses 1 related to the retaliatory shoot ing argue that: (1) the trial court erred in denying Mitchell’s motion to suppress statements he made to the police; (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain Stroud’s convictions for first-degree murder and aggravated assault, 2 and all of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- ANTHONY RICHARDSON and JAMES WALKER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Gilliam v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bynum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.