Legal Opinion

State v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 19, 1929No. [No. 6, January Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

The appellant in this case, in a former suit in which Arthur L. Bell and John F. Schwartz were defendants, recovered a verdict for $5,000, on which judgment was entered. On appeal the judgment was reversed as to Bell. The cause of action in that case was the accidental killing of the infant son of the equitable plaintiff by the automobile of Bell while being driven by Schwartz, and the question was whether Schwartz was the agent of Bell or an independent contractor. The case is reported as Bell v. State, use of Tondi, in 153 Md. 333.

Subsequently suit was brought by the appellant against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Perkins v. LevinessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dawson Produce Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Rodrigues-Novo v. Recchi America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Dixie Automobile Insurance Corporation v. MasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API