Legal Opinion

Carpenter, Chartered v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 11, 2003No. 02-7395PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Since the Civil War era, Congress has limited the fees attorneys may charge for representing persons who apply for veterans’ benefits. See Act of July 14, 1862, §§ 6-7, 12 Stat. 566, 568. Those limitations were originally implemented “to protect the veteran from extortion or improvident bargains with unscrupulous lawyers” who overcharged for work that consisted mainly of filing uncomplicated forms for pension benefits on behalf of veterans with limited literacy skills. Walters v. Nat’l Ass’n of Radiation Survivors, 473 U.S. 305, 359-62, 105 S.Ct. 3180, 87 L.Ed.2d 220…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. G Eorge R. T Heiss v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
  2. Northport Health Svcs. of Ark. v. USDHHSCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Snyder v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  4. EMILY's List v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Aectra Refining and Marketing Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API