Legal Opinion

Griffin v. City of Canon City

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 1961No. 19487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and we will refer to the plaintiffs in error as contestants and to defendant in error as Canon City or City. Certain parties were permitted to intervene and joined in the arguments advanced by the City in the trial court but do not appear here. The controversy arises out of the annexation of the Town of South Canon to the City of Canon City under the provisions of C.R.S. ’53, 139-9-13 and 14.

At an election held on July 28, 1959, a majority of the electors of both the Town of South Canon and the City of Canon City approved a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Enos v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Burns v. District Court of Eighteenth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. In re Constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 293Supreme Court of Colorado · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Port Valdez Company, Inc. v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Griffin v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tanner v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. Tanner v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API