Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tanner v. City of Boulder

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 24, 1962No. 20220Published

1DissentJustice McWilliams

In their complaint Tanner and Quinby, after averring that they are residents and taxpayers of the City of Boulder and are owners of real estate situated therein, allege that “each of them are persons aggrieved by certain annexation proceedings attempted by the defendant City of Boulder, within the terms and provisions of Section 139-11-6, C.R.S. 1953, and bring and institute this action as such” (Emphasis supplied.) The relief prayed for in each of their seven claims for relief is the invalidation of a completed annexation by Boulder of certain undeveloped land owned by one Hindry.

At the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. City of Canon CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API