Legal Opinion

Cho v. Chang

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 2013No. B239719PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*523Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

Appellant Jessica Chang appeals from a trial court order that in part denied her special motion to strike. After Chang filed suit against respondent Howard Cho and codefendant Midway International, Inc. (Midway), for sexual harassment and related torts, Cho filed a cross-complaint against Chang, alleging defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Chang filed a special motion to strike the cross-complaint as a “SLAPP” (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suit, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.1 She contends the activities…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Sheley v. HarropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API