Legal Opinion
In re Michael L.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 22, 2000No. AC 19431PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The respondent mother1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor children, M, S and J. On appeal, the respondent claims that (1) the court improperly found that she had failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B),2 *690(2) the statutory ground of failure to achieve rehabilitation, as defined by § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B), is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to her, (3) the court violated her constitutional rights when…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Stanley D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Mariah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Victoria B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In re Amanda A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Alejandro L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.