Legal Opinion

Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 8, 1996No. 95-2129PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Balancing responsibility between federal and state governments in a republic that assigns interlocking sovereignty to each often requires federal courts to walk an unsteady tightrope. From a federal court’s perspective, this special sort of judicial funambulism always must proceed in the spirit of cooperative federalism tempered, however, by the need to avoid the pitfalls inherent in blind deference to state autonomy.

The case at hand implicates the division of responsibilities between federal and state judicial systems but does not require us to walk a very high wire. We…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Community Health Center, Inc. v. RullanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API