Legal Opinion

Vonk v. Dunn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1989No. CV-88-0405-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

The Vonks brought this action to foreclose a mortgage that the Dunns had given to secure the purchase of land. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Vonks and the court of appeals affirmed. Vonk v. Dunn, 159 Ariz. 134, 765 P.2d 536 (Ct.App.1988). We granted the Dunns’ petition for review to determine whether equitable considerations apply to acceleration clauses and, if so, whether a factual issue concerning unconscionability precluded summary judgment foreclosing the mortgage. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Baltimore Life Insurance Company v. HarnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Arizona Coffee Shops, Inc. v. Phoenix Downtown Parking Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Valley National Bank v. WitterArizona Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chaparral Development v. RMED International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp. v. Roemer Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp. v. Roemer Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Vonk v. DunnArizona Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API