Chaparral Development v. RMED International, Inc.

OPINION

VOSS, Presiding Judge.

The question presented here is whether reinstatement of a contract under A.R.S. § 33-813 allows a trustor to prevent a judi cial foreclosure of a deed of trust. The trial court ruled that reinstatement only protects the trustor from a trustee’s sale, not from foreclosure, and accordingly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff, the beneficiary under the deed of trust. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On appeal from summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty &…