Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Langford

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1990No. D-0130PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause once more presents the issue of whether a wrongful death and survival action can be brought when a viable fetus is subsequently stillborn. Tex.Rev.Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 71.002 & 71.021 (Vernon 1986). The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the wrongful death and survival statutes do not permit a cause of action for the death of a fetus. The court of appeals construed the statutes as allowing a cause of action and therefore reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the cause for trial. 790 S.W.2d 127 (1990). We have held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witty v. American General Capital Distributors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Tarrant County Hospital District v. NormaTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Langford v. Blackman, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Krishnan v. SepulvedaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Farley v. SartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pietila v. CritesTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Booth v. Cathey, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API