Legal Opinion

Pietila v. Crites

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1993No. D-2282PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a medical malpractice case for emotional harm from the loss of a fetus. After the plaintiffs declined to amend their petition, the trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant physicians. The court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, reversed and remanded, holding there was a common law cause of action for mental anguish resulting from the loss of a fetus. 826 S.W.2d 175. We hold that mental anguish damages for the parents are not recoverable when the only asserted cause of action is negligence toward the fetus. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Witty v. American General Capital Distributors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Blackman v. LangfordTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Crites v. Pietila, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Friesenhahn v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Edinburg Hospital Authority v. TreviñoTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Perry v. S.N.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API