Legal Opinion

Booth v. Cathey

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided March 10, 1995No. 06-94-00092-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLEIL, Justice.

Jerry and Glenda Booth appeal from an adverse summary judgment. We conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the doctor and the hospital for the mental anguish the Booths suffered as a result of the negligent treatment of the fetus. Otherwise, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Jerry and Glenda Booth sued George Cathey, M.D., and Wood County Central Hospital, alleging that the negligence of the doctor and hospital had resulted in the stillborn birth of the Booths’ child on August 1, 1990, and in physical pain and mental anguish to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bradley v. Quality Service Tank LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Houston v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wiggins v. Overstreet, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  4. Brandes v. Rice Trust, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API