McGraw-Edison Company v. Haverluk
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EURKE, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action to repossess certain merchandise as the assignee of a •conditional sales contract. The defendant answered and counterclaimed, alleging •breach of warranty. By claim and delivery proceedings the plaintiff secured possession of the merchandise and sold it. Thereafter the case went to trial upon defendant’s counterclaim, before the court without a jury, and judgment was awarded to the defendant. The plaintiff then moved for a new trial which was denied. This appeal is from the order denying a new trial.
There were five grounds set forth in the motion for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Larson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Kern v. KelnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- International Harvester Co. of America v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Holden v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Kavli v. LeifmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moen v. Norwest Bank of MinotDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
- Berg v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981