Legal Opinion

McGraw-Edison Company v. Haverluk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1964No. 8053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EURKE, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to repossess certain merchandise as the assignee of a •conditional sales contract. The defendant answered and counterclaimed, alleging •breach of warranty. By claim and delivery proceedings the plaintiff secured possession of the merchandise and sold it. Thereafter the case went to trial upon defendant’s counterclaim, before the court without a jury, and judgment was awarded to the defendant. The plaintiff then moved for a new trial which was denied. This appeal is from the order denying a new trial.

There were five grounds set forth in the motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Larson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Kern v. KelnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Holden v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kavli v. LeifmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moen v. Norwest Bank of MinotDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
  2. Berg v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API