Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. v. Cuming County
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited, contending that the bonded debt was not a lawful charge against territory subsequently annexed : Bineman v. B. Co., 7 Neb., 310; 1 Dill., Mun. Cor., sec. 104; Phillips v. Albany, 28 Wis., 340; Davenport v. Dodge Co., 105 U. S., 237; Blair v. Ckming Co., Ill Id., 363. cited: 1 Dillon, Mun. Corp., 212; 77. S. v. Memphis, 97 U. S., 284; Powers v. Wood Co., 8 O. St., 285.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover certain taxes paid under protest. On the trial of the cause in the court below judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the action dismissed. The case was tried upon the following stipulation of facts:
“The following is the agreed state of facts in this cause:
“ First — This is an appeal from the order of the county board rejecting the plaintiff’s claim for the repayment of certain taxes for the year 1887. It is agreed that said taxes were paid under protest in due form by the said plaintiff, and a repayment…
2Cited by6 opinions
- LINKY v. Board of County Com'rs of Grand CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Winslow v. France, TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Blake v. JacksIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Union Tp. v. Oakdale Tp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Keck v. Joint Class a School District No. 370Idaho Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.