Union Tp. v. Oakdale Tp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washita County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Oakdale Township against Union Township. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
This is a suit for money had and received. On January 22, 1908, the defendant in error, Oak-dale township, as plaintiff below, filed its petition against Union township, plaintiff in error, as defendant below, in the district court of Washita county. The petition stated substantially, the following state of facts: That prior to January 4, 1904, Union township embraced all the territory in both plaintiff and defendant townships at the time of suit. That on January 4,1904, the board of county commissioners of Washita county divided Union township, creating the south half…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Commissioners of Currituck County v. Commissioners of Dare CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Watson v. Commissioners of PamlicoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Winslow v. France, TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- School District of Saginaw v. School District No. 6 of Buena VistaMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Liberty Tp. v. Rock Island Tp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Anderson v. ClardyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931