Freddie Joe Simmons v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was employed by the defendant. He brought an action on a variety of theories, claiming that the defendant monitored and disclosed the contents of conversations appellant engaged in while working as a testboardman, a receiver of customer trouble reports. The trial court granted summary judgment against plaintiff on all issues. The facts and the trial court’s reasons for its disposition are thoroughly set forth in the trial court’s opinion reported at 452 F.Supp. 392 (W.D.Okl.1978).
We affirm for the reasons given by the trial court.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Simmons v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Carmie Watkins v. L.M. Berry & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Ali v. Douglas Cable CommunicationsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Jandak v. Village of BrookfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Abbott v. Village of Winthrop HarborDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.