Legal Opinion
Ketcham v. Wilbur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
These actions are brought to recover damages for breach of oral agreements alleged to have been made by defendant’s testatrix, one with the foster mother of plaintiff in the first entitled action, to the effect that if plaintiff, her grandniece, survived her, testatrix would leave her by will, for her sole benefit and use, such sum as would be sufficient to provide liberally for her support and education, including a musical education, from the time of testatrix’s death until the grandniece should arrive at full age.
The second action is brought by the foster mother to recover under an alleged…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hahl v. . SugoNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Carroll v. . BullockNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Hessler v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Ketcham v. WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Ketcham v. WilburAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hebranko v. Bioline Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re CourbatDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1967
- Coastal Equipment Co. v. HerrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Steinert v.Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.