Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rosenberg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 4, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The present proceeding marks the renascence of a proceeding instituted over four years ago, which, in its meanderings through the courts, and its result in the Court of Appeals, has assumed, to a moderate degree, the position of a cause celebre.
The applicant now seeks an order to compel her former attorneys to make restitution to her of the fixed sum of $2,750, which is the amount which this court, in a former proceeding under section 231-a, determined to be the excess over a reasonable allowance exacted from her by these attorneys. Any evaluation of her right to this relief…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Penniman's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- In re FlanaganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of HearnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of WoolfsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of GellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of LevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.