Legal Opinion

Coastal Equipment Co. v. Herrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The judgment, although entered on default, was unauthorized, in so far as it granted relief more favorable than that demanded in the complaint. It was open to attack, therefore, either by motion or in any form that the defendants might elect. (Clapp v. McCabe, 155 N. Y. 525.)

The prayer for relief demanded that the plaintiff be adjudged the owner and entitled to possession of the chattels and that they be delivered; and that in case possession could not be given, that the plaintiff have judgment for their value. Here, the judgment awarded the chattels to the plaintiff. In addition, plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clapp v. . McCabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Ketcham v. WilburAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Ketcham v. WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Greenberger v. North Side Storage Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sivakoff v. SivakoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Foley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
  3. Nelli v. National Surety Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Stanford v. Van SkiverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API