Legal Opinion
Inyangette v. Bowser
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1776Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EKERE INYANGETTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25 - 1776 (LLA) MURIEL BOWSER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ekere Inyangette, proceeding pro se, brings this action against District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser, alleging that the District—which Mayor Bowser oversees— violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fifth Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment when it revoked his driver’s license. ECF No. 1, at 3, 7.1 Mayor Bowser has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 5.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.