Legal Opinion
Major v. Frontenac Industries, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 1995No. 65867PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Presiding Judge.
In this products liability action, plaintiff James Major obtained a jury verdict against the seller of the product, Frontenac Industries, Inc., and the seller prevailed on a third party claim for indemnity against the manufacturer, M.S. Churchman Co., Inc. Prior to trial, plaintiff and seller entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to § 587.065 RSMo 1994. After post-trial motions, the trial court amended the judgment reducing the amount of plaintiffs recovery and of Frontenac’s recovery on its cross-claim from $455,000.00 to $51,000.00. Plaintiff and Frontenac…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Stephenson v. McClureMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Erslon v. Vee-Jay Cement Contracting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Love v. Park Lane Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Carter v. Tom's Truck Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stroup v. LeipardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Major v. Frontenac Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of St. Louis v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. INC.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
- Tiny Totland, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc. And Evenflo Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Tiny Totland v. Spalding & EvenfloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001