Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. McClure

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1980No. 11458PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

In this personal injury action one defendant (the appellant) settled with the minor plaintiff taking a general release. By his first amended cross claim, the appellant seeks to recover from the other defendant (the respondent) all or part of the amount paid by the appellant as consideration for the release. The trial court sustained the respondent’s motion to dismiss the cross-claim. The appellant (settling defendant) has appealed, basing his right to recover upon the authority of Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Whitehead & Kales Co., 566 S.W.2d 466 (Mo. banc 1978); hereafter referred to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Maryland Heights Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. FerrissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Roth v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hyde v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of RaytownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Tarrasch v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Ex Rel. Club Exchange Corp. v. Farmers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API