Legal Opinion

Pickman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 19, 1936No. [Nos. 21, 22, April Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

On appeals from conviction and sentence of the appellants on charges of conspiracy to cheat and defraud customers of money paid for the purchase of securities, five rulings on offers of evidence are brought for review. No questions of fact or of legal sufficiency of the evidence to prove guilt are before this court on appeal. Doxen v. State, 151 Md. 118, 125, 134 A. 166; Wolf v. State, 143 Md. 489, 493, 504, 122 A. 641; Luery v. State, 116 Md. 284, 294, 81 A. 681, 685. Therefore facts need be stated only to explain the rulings reviewed.

There was evidence that the defendants, through a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1833
  2. Luery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Niemoth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Simond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Wolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API