Legal Opinion
Schenley Affiliated Brands Corp. v. Kirby
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1971No. Civ. 12893PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
Petitioners are a group of liquor distillers and wholesalers. In their petition for mandate they seek alternative kinds of relief, either a writ restraining the Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control from enforcing an amended administrative regulation of his department or a writ directing the superior court to hear and determine a lawsuit directed to the same end. Appearing as amici curiae in petitioners’ support is the California Grocers Association, which states that it represents 5,800 California retail stores. At the inception of this action we issued a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ford Dealers Assn. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Credit Insurance General Agents Ass'n v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc. v. City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.