Sutor v. Rogotzke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an action for death by wrongful act arising out of a hunting accident. The jury found for defendant. The trial court granted a new trial on the ground it was error to deny plaintiff’s requested instruction on res ipsa loquitur. Defendant appeals and we. affirm.
On October 13, 1968, decedent, William Sutor, was duck hunting in a slough near the city of Springfield, Brown County. De fendant, Daniel Dean Rogotzke, then 17, was also hunting in the area when a friend passed by and showed defendant a .22-caliber rifle. Defendant explained the accident in the following manner:
“We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Okrina v. Midwestern CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Skinner v. OchiltreeSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Corn v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Naegele v. DollenNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Bossons v. the Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Gordon v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Leuer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Gordon v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981