Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Texas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1933No. 584PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought by appellant, Hopkins, as lessor under three leases dated respectively April 4, 1925, December 7, 1925, and December 16, 1919, against appellee, a successor lessee, to obtain an accounting for gasoline and residue gas, manufactured and extracted as by-products from casinghead gas. The answer was that the defendant had fully accounted by rendering up the oil and gas stipulated for in the leases, except the sum of $81.23, which was tendered into court. The defense was sustained and the bill was dismissed.
An objection to the consideration of the ease…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mussellem v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Central Improvement Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- National Acc. Soc. v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Wilson v. King Smith Ref. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harding v. CameronDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1963
- Application of MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- General Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Craven v. ShoultsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. CornishDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.