Legal Opinion

Application of Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1957No. 36888, 36930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Early in 1949 a certain half-section of land now included in the Elk City Field of Western Oklahoma, was unexplored and undeveloped for oil and gas mining purposes, but M. G. Martin and others owned an oil and gas lease thereon. Instead of performing the exploration and development contemplated in said lease, said lessees *661decided to assign it to E. Constantin, Jr., and reserve unto themselves what is termed an overriding royalty in the oil and gas and other minerals that said land might produce. Accordingly, they entered into a contract with Constantin whereby they agreed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Hunter v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. GlassDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
  2. XAE CORP. v. SMR Property Management Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Shell Oil Company v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API