Legal Opinion

State v. Fore

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 18, 1989No. 22579-1-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

The State of Washington appeals from an order suppressing evidence seized incident to an allegedly unlawful arrest. The State contends that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest the respondent, thereby rendering the subsequent searches lawful.

Erskine C. Fore was charged with possession of marijuana with intent to manufacture or deliver. Prior to trial, Fore moved to suppress evidence seized incident to his arrest, i.e., a green vegetable matter cigarette, seized from his person, and a large plastic baggie containing smaller plastic packets of green vegetable matter, seized from a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. United States v. Michael Allen VaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API