IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Washington, Chief Judge:
A.H. and T.L., biological parents of minor children A.L. and Ta.L., along with the *1068children’s aunt, E.A., challenge the trial court’s decision granting the adoption of A.L. and Ta.L. by their foster parents, R.W. and A.W. (the “W.s”), and denying E.A.’s adoption petition. This court granted the petition by appellees R.W. and A.W. for rehearing en banc, thereby vacating its original opinion in this case, In re Ta.L., 75 A.3d 122 (D.C. 2013), vacated sub nom. In re R.W., 91 A.3d 1020 (D.C. 2014), in part because this appeal raises serious concerns about our prior…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Brian Gill v. Rodney Van NostrandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re Petition of J.O. & P.O., N.B. & Ki.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- In Re K.C. D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re J.M. & D.M. S.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- E.P.L. v. J.L.-A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.