Legal Opinion

Dixon v. CertainTeed Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 8, 1996No. Civil Action 94-2310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant CertainTeed Corporation (“CertainTeed”) for partial summary judgment (Doe. 127), pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff has responded (Doc. 176) and opposes CertainTeed’s motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

Plaintiff filed the instant action alleging negligence on the part of CertainTeed. He claims he suffered permanent injuries in July 1994 resulting from a fall at CertainTeed’s plant. Plaintiffs Complaint includes a claim for loss of consortium.

CertainTeed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Chandler v. Central Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finkel v. Polichuk (In re Polichuk)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Staudenmayer v. StaudenmayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Baughn v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  4. Staudenmayer v. StaudenmayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API