Legal Opinion
Baughn v. Eli Lilly and Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 17, 2005No. CIV.A.03-2626-KHVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Barbara Baughn filed this product liability action against Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”). Plaintiff alleges that she suffered injuries because her mother took diethylstilbestrol (“DES”), a prescription drug, during her pregnancy with Barbara in 1964 and 1965. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Eli Lilly And Company’s Second Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 42) filed October 1, 2004; Plaintiffs Motion To Strike Affidavit Of John F. Kuckelman And Supporting Memorandum Of Law (Doc. #44) filed October 11, 2004; Plaintiffs Motion To Strike Second…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelley v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- BRANSTETER v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Butler v. Daimler Trucks North America LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Roeder v. American Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021