Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2002No. 01-CV-1101PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

The question in this case is whether a forum selection clause mandating that claims be brought in Virginia should be applied to appellant’s purported class action involving consumers’ attempts to register for and use Verizon Internet Services, Inc.’s (“VIS”) digital subscriber line (“DSL”) service. We hold that enforcement of this clause is reasonable and that all of appellant’s claims fall within the scope of the clause. Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s suit.

I

VIS is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Terra International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Carl v. Children's HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Pinto Technology Ventures, L.P. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Feldman v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ajemian v. Yahoo!, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API