Legal Opinion

Shulsky v. Shulsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In this action for divorce for alleged abandonment, defendant moves to strike part of paragraph Seventh of the complaint on the ground that it contains c ‘ prejudicial matter unnecessarily inserted ”, pursuant to CPLR 3024 (subd. [b]). By this paragraph plaintiff alleges that there is no judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff in any court of competent jurisdiction, and that no action has been brought or is now pending for the same relief and concludes with the following: “ other than an action for a Judicial Separation previously commenced by defendant against plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Jones v. JonesNew York City Family Court · 1966
  4. Hickman v. HickmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
  5. Case v. CaseNew York City Family Court · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Small v. SmallNew York City Family Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API