Legal Opinion

Case v. Case

New York City Family Court

Decided June 24, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustine Wise Polier, J.

This ease presents one of the many variations of factors in which, where parties married and later separated, the husband claims no responsibility for support, on the ground that either his or the petitioner’s divorce from a prior spouse was not valid. Reading the cases in this field reveals the tortuous and tortured process by which courts have sought to uphold the strict rules of law concerning the meaning of a marriage void ab initio by reason of incapacity to marry and have also tried to avoid condoning some of the most glaring abuses of that doctrine against innocent parties. They have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. In re ButtlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hahn v. FalceNew York City Family Court · 1968
  2. Sherif v. SherifNew York City Family Court · 1974
  3. Shulsky v. ShulskyNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Marc v. MarcNew York City Family Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API