Legal Opinion

Barclay Commerce Corp. v. Finkelstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

January 15,1958, plaintiff and the corporate defendant entered into a factoring agreement. Simultaneously Avith the execution of such agreement the individual defendants, in order to induce plaintiff to enter the factoring agreement, executed a Avritten agreement guaranteeing payment of moneys Avhich might become due.

Subsequently, plaintiff purchased accounts receivable, making its last advance to the corporate defendant on April 17, 1959, at Avhich time the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Strasburger v. RosenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robin v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Edelkind v. Fairmont Funding, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Heimbinder v. BerkovitzNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Arnav Industries, Inc. Employee Retirement Trust v. Westside Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API