Barclay Commerce Corp. v. Finkelstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
January 15,1958, plaintiff and the corporate defendant entered into a factoring agreement. Simultaneously Avith the execution of such agreement the individual defendants, in order to induce plaintiff to enter the factoring agreement, executed a Avritten agreement guaranteeing payment of moneys Avhich might become due.
Subsequently, plaintiff purchased accounts receivable, making its last advance to the corporate defendant on April 17, 1959, at Avhich time the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Strasburger v. RosenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robin v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Edelkind v. Fairmont Funding, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Heimbinder v. BerkovitzNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Arnav Industries, Inc. Employee Retirement Trust v. Westside Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992