Legal Opinion
Heimbinder v. Berkovitz
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carolyn E. Demarest, J.
This action by plaintiffs claiming damages against defendants for fraud seeks to enforce the rights of the corporate plaintiff and its sole stockholder against defendant Joseph Berkovitz, also known as Joseph Berkowitz, personally based upon his alleged guarantee of the promissory note executed by him on behalf of the corporate defendant Formadyne Indus*810tries, Inc. on June 12, 1990 (Note) and further seeks to invalidate various transfers to defendants alleged to have been made in violation of Debtor and Creditor Law §§ 273 and 276 and the alleged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Southern Industries, Inc. v. JeremiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. LefrakNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. LefrakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J JEWELRY, CO.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Cable Co. v. Organes Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Edelkind v. Fairmont Funding, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Jenkins v. JenkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1999