Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

On this appeal, we are to determine whether the right of compensation now claimed by appellant is barred by sec. 102.12, Stats. 1949. That section provided in part:

“Regardless of whether notice was received, if no payment of compensation (other than medical treatment or burial expense) is made, and no application filed with the commission within two years from the date of the injury or death, or from the date the employee or his dependent knew or ought to have known the nature of the disability and its relation to the employment, the right to compensation therefor shall be barred, except that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peterson Cutting Die Co. v. Bach Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Zabkowicz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lindahl v. LindahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Lindahl v. LindahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API