Legal Opinion

Zabkowicz v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*319Fairchild, J.

The court below ruled that the findings required in accident cases do not appear to support the dismissal of the application for compensation, although filed more than two years after the date of an accidental injury, even though it is conceded that no compensation had been paid and the employer did not know and ought not to have known within the two-year period that the employee had sustained or probably would sustain permanent disability. On this point the ruling of the commission is referred to, and there is no occasion for returning the matter to the commission to consider…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rathjen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Jutton-Kelly Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Milwaukee Malleable & Grey Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Andrzeczak v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. DILHRCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  4. Wisconsin Insurance Security Fund v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. Zabkowicz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API