Legal Opinion
In re Emma B.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 29, 2017No. Docket: Ken-17-59PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHjelm, J.
[¶ 1] In this child protection action, the father of Emma B. appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court (Water-ville, Mathews, J.) finding that the child is in circumstances of jeopardy, see 22 M.R.S. §§ 4035, 4036 (2016), and ordering that the child be placed in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services and that the Department cease reunification efforts with him. On appeal, the father does not challenge the jeopardy order on its merits but rather argues that the court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the child protection petition as to him for lack of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Maine v. Roy BlumSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- In re Child of Ryan F.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- In re Children of Mary J.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State v. BlumSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- In re Child of Stephen E.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.