Legal Opinion
Ventress v. Japan Airlines
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2007No. 04-17353, 05-15044, 06-15904PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Martin Ventress, a flight engineer, and Jack Crawford, a commercial pilot (collectively, “plaintiffs”), sued Japan Airlines and other entities, making a number of claims. They appeal a judgment on the pleadings for Japan Airlines and its subsidiary Jalways Co., Ltd. (collectively, “JAL”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse.
Ventress separately challenges the district court’s venue transfer order and an order compelling arbitration of his claims against Hawaii Aviation Contract Services, Inc. (“HACS”). We affirm the venue transfer and dismiss…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De HondurasSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Martin Ventress v. Japan AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Rooz v. Kimmel (In Re Kimmel)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Ferrero LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
- Earth Island Institute v. QuinnDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.